Good vs. Bad Julius Ceasar

In the time of the ruling of Julius Caesar, all of the Romans loved just close to of Caesars qualities. He was a good and popular draw and did a lot for the people. But some Romans had a job with Caesar and plan to kill him. These people were Brutus and Cassius. This started a civil struggle amid the Romans. This war may contain been pr correctted if Brutus and Cassius had done things a modest differently. Cassius would throw away made a get around leader or else than Brutus. Cassius also had more of a passion to kill Caesar. Brutus did non have the morals of a killer give premeditation Caesar did.         As far as soldiery strategy goes Cassius had the better mindset for it. Brutus was not a very good military strategist. Cassius knew that it would be a good idea to kill Antony. He perspective that Antony would talk the people into trying to kill Brutus and Cassius even though their intentions were good. But Brutus did not want to make it facial g esture like a livestock bath. Also at Caesars funeral, he trusted Antony to say only good things about Brutus and Cassius and not that they are murderers. When Cassius said that they should kill Antony too, Brutus said he did not want to make it look like a blood bath. He was vengeful and explosive.

He argued with Brutus about lying, to the maneuver where they jeopardise each some others lives. Cassius said they should not march to participation of Philippi because it would cloy the troops out and they would not have the advantage of cosmos in their own territory. On the other hand, Brutus thought that if they marched to Philippi they would catch Antony! s troops eat up guard. Instead of doing what Brutus said, they should have listened to Cassius.         Although they... If you want to get a secure essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper